Skip to main content

$5,000 Gold Bandwagon Now Includes These 65 Analysts – Got Gold?

The small group of gold enthusiasts who started out few in numbers a few years back has made a parabolic move over the past year or so much like their projections for the future price of gold. They now number an unbelievable 108 who have stated, with sound reasons in their opinions, why gold could quite possibly go to a parabolic top of at least $2,500 an ounce – to even as much as an unimaginable $15,000 – before the bubble finally pops! In fact, the majority (65) maintain that $5,000 or more for gold is likely.
In this article I identify the economists, academics, analysts and financial writers who hold such a lofty opinion of the prospects for gold and provide the URLs of their articles so you can ascertain for yourself their logic for such parabolic moves in the years to come.
(Please note: This is a one-of-a-kind article which no doubt will get a great deal of attention and be posted on a large number of other financial sites and blogs. This is encouraged but to avoid copyright infringement the author’s name must be included with a hyperlink to the original article.)
Higher than $10,000
1. Mike Maloney: $15,000;
www.goldbasics.blogspot.com/2009/09/gold-should-reach-15000-oz-mike-maloney.html
2. Ben Davies: $10,000 – $15,000;
www.thedailygold.com/commentaries/hinde-capitals-ben-davies-on-the-gold-market/?p=3905/
3. Howard Katz: $14,000; 24hgold.com/english/contributor.aspxcontributor=Howard+S.+Katz&article=2241359014G10020 &redirect=False
4. Dr. Jeffrey Lewis: $7,000 – $14,000;
www.silver-coin-investor.com/gold-and-silver.html
5. Jim Rickards: $4,000 – $11,000;
www.cnbc.com/id/34038650/Gold_s_Money_Value_is_4_000_to_11_000_Market_Strategist
6. Roland Watson: $10,800 (in our lifetime);
www.goldeagle.com/editorials_05/watson081605.html
$5,000 – $10,000
1. Bob Kirtley: $10,000 (by 2011);
www.goldeditor.com/wp-content/uploads/editorpdfsimages/Gold-Prices-at-10-000.pdf
2. Arnold Bock: $10,000 (by 2012);
munknee.com/2010/06/gold-going-to-parabolic-top-of-10000-by-2012-%e2%80%93-for-good-reasons/
3. Porter Stansberry: $10,000 (by 2012);
www.kitco.com/ind/stansberry/dec022009.html
4. Tom Fischer: $10,000;
www.gold.approximity.com/gold_price_models_sinclair.html
5. Shayne McGuire: $10,000;
www.safehaven.com/article/9572/shayne-mcguire-the-early-innings-of-a-gold-boom
6. Eric Hommelberg: $10,000;
www.gold-speculator.com/eric-hommelberg/17257-golds-inflation-adjusted-high-reaches-8000-a.html
7. Anonymous: $6,410 – $10,000 (by 2012-2016);
www.tl-ph.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=6876483182&topic=4979&post=15682
8. David Petch; $6,000 – $10,000;
www.financialsense/fsu/editorials/petch/2008/0304b.html
9. Gerald Celente: $6,000 – $10,000;
www.trendsresearch.com/forecast.html
10. Egon von Greyerz: $6,000 – $10,000;
www.goldswitzerland.com/index.php/gold-entering-a-virtuous-circle-egonvongreyerz/ utm_source=subscriber&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss
11. Peter Schiff: $5,000 – $10,000 (in 5 to 10 years);
www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_23/b4181044623002.htm
commodityonline.com/news/Gold-forecast-Jim-Rogers-Peter-Schiff-or-Roubini-23940-3-1.html


Read More: Here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Census Bureau: Means-Tested Gov't Benefit Recipients Outnumber Full-Time Year-Round Workers

(CNSNews.com) - Americans who were recipients of means-tested government benefits in 2011 outnumbered year-round full-time workers, according to data released this month by the Census Bureau. They also out-numbered the total population of the Philippines. There were 108,592,000 people in the United States in the fourth quarter of 2011 who were recipients of one or more means-tested government benefit programs, the Census Bureau said in data released this week. Meanwhile, according to the Census Bureau, there were 101,716,000 people who worked full-time year round in 2011. That included both private-sector and government workers. See more at: cnsnews

U.S. State Finances – Lack “Truth and Integrity” – Volcker Warns

- U.S. state budgets rely on “faulty practices” – Volcker - Shoddy budget practices push costs to future generations - Faulty budget practices lead to poor policy making - “Problems hidden by lack of truth and integrity” – Volcker - No common definition of balanced budget allows for gimmicks The highly regarded former chairman of the Federal Reserve, Paul Volcker, has severely criticized the State Governments in the U.S. over “faulty practices” used to devise budgets which mask the true financial position of those states. Read more: here