When the law gets bent out of shape for him, it’s easier to bend out of shape of the rest of us.
By Emily Bazelon
Posted Friday, April 19, 2013, at 11:29 PM
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev will not hear his Miranda rights before the FBI questions him Friday night. He will have to remember on his own that he has a right to a lawyer, and that anything he says can be used against him in court, because the government won’t tell him. This is an extension of a rule the Justice Department wrote for the FBI—without the oversight of any court—called the “public safety exception.”
By Emily Bazelon
Posted Friday, April 19, 2013, at 11:29 PM
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev will not hear his Miranda rights before the FBI questions him Friday night. He will have to remember on his own that he has a right to a lawyer, and that anything he says can be used against him in court, because the government won’t tell him. This is an extension of a rule the Justice Department wrote for the FBI—without the oversight of any court—called the “public safety exception.”
There is one specific circumstance in which it makes sense
to hold off on Miranda. It’s exactly what the name of the exception
suggests. The police can interrogate a suspect without offering him the
benefit of Miranda if he could have information that’s of urgent concern
for public safety. That may or may not be the case with Tsarnaev. The
problem is that Attorney General Eric Holder has stretched the law
beyond that scenario. And that should trouble anyone who worries about
the police railroading suspects, which can end in false confessions. No
matter how unsympathetic accused terrorists are, the precedents the
government sets for them matter outside the easy context of questioning
them. When the law gets bent out of shape for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, it’s
easier to bend out of shape of the rest of us.
Read more: here
Read more: here
Comments
Post a Comment